Response
SLA by agreement (incidents / severity)
We take over day-to-day operations for Windows and Linux servers: patching, security, backups, monitoring, and incident response — for stable and predictable service.
Server incidents almost always cost more than prevention. We implement routine operations: patching, configuration control, backups, monitoring, logging, and a clear incident response process.
The focus is stability and predictability: less firefighting, more automation, transparent reporting, and well-defined runbooks. We support single servers as well as full environments.
SLA by agreement (incidents / severity)
Runbooks + change control
Reports, logs, work history
Least privilege, MFA, patching
If servers are business-critical, you need predictable operations and routine maintenance — not constant firefighting.
Daily operations + planned maintenance + incident response.
Windows Update/WSUS, Linux repos, kernel/firmware — with maintenance windows and reporting.
MFA, SSH/RDP policies, access reviews, disabling unnecessary services, baseline CIS approach.
Backup strategy, schedules, storage, encryption, and restore testing.
CPU/RAM/disk, services, certificates, queues, log space, severity-based alerts.
Triage, containment, recovery, post-incident analysis and prevention actions.
Server/role inventory, access, diagrams, runbooks, change log.
Changes happen on schedule, with lower risk and a clear rollback path.
Logs + metrics + alerts to detect issues before users do.
We make operations systematic: processes, automation, and visibility instead of ad-hoc manual work.
Kickoff: 3–10 days for inventory and baseline setup. Then ongoing operations (daily/weekly cadence).
Server list, roles, access, risks, current state.
Access, patching, backups, logs, baseline security settings.
Metrics, service checks, alerting rules and priorities.
Patching, planned work, backup verification, preventive tasks.
Response, recovery, postmortems, and preventive actions.
Three common operational scenarios and how we handle them.
Updates were postponed for months — higher vulnerability exposure and sudden failures risk.
Introduced maintenance windows, a test group, a rollback plan, and patching reports.
Regular patch cycles with predictable change management.
Backups “exist”, but restores were never tested — real data loss risk.
Implemented 3-2-1 policy, encryption, job verification, and scheduled restore tests.
Confidence in recoverability and reduced downtime.
Services failed silently — problems were discovered only after complaints.
Added service checks, disk and log monitoring, certificate expiry tracking, severity-based alerting.
Faster detection and recovery (lower MTTR).
These are the most frequent causes of incidents, downtime, and unplanned costs.
Updates are applied “sometime later”, without maintenance windows or reporting.
Jobs run, but restores are never verified.
Shared admin accounts, no MFA, permissions are not reviewed.
Only CPU/RAM is watched; services/certificates/queues are ignored.
Changes are made ad-hoc without documentation or rollback.
No log rotation; disks fill up and services stop.
Depends on server count, service criticality, security requirements, and support mode.
Small environment, scheduled patching and backup control.
Monitoring, incidents, routine work, reporting.
Critical services, extended monitoring, SLA and on-call.
Share server count and critical services — we’ll propose a support model and budget.
Then we implement a stable operations cadence and observability across your environment.